This post will focus on 1 Timothy 5:1-6:10. This focuses on Paul’s presentation of the material by giving a brief summary of the sections. For… Read More »FIRST TIMOTHY BIBLICAL ARGUMENT – Presentation continued (pt. 4)
This post will focus on 1 Timothy 2:1-4:16. This focuses on Paul’s presentation of the material by giving a brief summary of the sections. For… Read More »FIRST TIMOTHY BIBLICAL ARGUMENT – Presentation continued (pt. 3)
Structure, Outline, and Presentation Structure and Outline First Timothy contains a personal but official salutation. The body of the letter contains four main parts: Paul’s… Read More »FIRST TIMOTHY BIBLICAL ARGUMENT – Structure, Outline, and Presentation (pt. 2)
Students of the Bible should have a goal of being able to write an argument of a Bible book. To begin, you need to develop… Read More »FIRST TIMOTHY BIBLICAL ARGUMENT (pt. 1)
This book is well suited for those interested in the controversy surrounding the New Perspective’s view of justification, including the role of the Law and… Read More »Conclusion to Piper’s “The Future of Justification”
Continuing our series on prayer and how to delight in it and God, today we look at the model that Christ laid forth. Next time,… Read More »Praying as Jesus Prayed
Next, we look at how Jack Deere views the office of the prophets and prophecy both in biblical times and modern times. The main definition… Read More »Prophecy: Jack Deere’s view on it
This post discusses the meaning of truth as defined by Nicholas Wolterstorff in his article “True Words.” How does Wolterstorff define truth? interact with his… Read More »“True Words” by Nicholas Wolterstorff – what is truth?
The self-identified postmodern philosopher Richard Rorty asserts: “Relativism is the view that every belief on a certain topic, or perhaps about any topic, is as… Read More »Is relativism and postmodernism the same?
Book Review of Stanley Grenz and Roger Olson’s “Who Needs Theology”. The book describes the public misconception about theology in the church, the good and the bad, and… Read More »RESPONSE TO GRENZ & OLSON, WHO NEEDS THEOLOGY?