Piper’s Thesis of “THE FUTURE OF JUSTIFICATION”
The Thesis of “The Future of Justification” In the opening lines of the introduction, Piper lays out the intent and thesis of the book: “the… Read More »Piper’s Thesis of “THE FUTURE OF JUSTIFICATION”
The Thesis of “The Future of Justification” In the opening lines of the introduction, Piper lays out the intent and thesis of the book: “the… Read More »Piper’s Thesis of “THE FUTURE OF JUSTIFICATION”
After reviewing the mediate view of imputation on sin and evaluating it, we now turn our attention to a more popular view on the Realistic view of Imputation of sin.
The earliest explanation for the sin of Adam and the guilt of all his descendants was the realistic theory which states that human nature constitutes both generically and numerically a single unit.[1] The same substance which acted in Adam and Eve, having been communicated to us, their act was as truly and properly our act, being the act of our reason and will, as it was their act.[2] It is imputed to us therefore not as his, but as our own. This means humanity literally sinned in Adam, and consequently the guilt of that sin is our personal guilt and the consequent corruption of nature is the effect of our own voluntary act.[3] “The total guilt of the first sin, thus committed by the entire race in Adam, is imputed to each individual of the race, because of the indivisibility of guilt.”[4] This means that each individual nature is guilty and corrupt for the whole of the first sin or “offense” against God because even though the common nature is divisible by propagation, the offense and the guilt are not divisible.[5]
As a follow up to the previous post, here is an example of Hebrew Parallelism taken from Psalm 19. This is just one way that… Read More »Hebrew Parallelism in Psalm 19
The purpose of this assignment is to make at least ten observations from the section of Acts 1:6-11. The point is to not only enhance… Read More »10 Observations from Acts 1:6-11
This assignment is to perform an additional 25 observations on Acts 1:8 Acts 1:8 (NASB) “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come… Read More »More Observations on Acts 1:8
The following posts will comprise a series of smaller parts that make up the whole of the bigger review. This review was issued to seminary… Read More »Surprised by the Voice of God Review
This post discusses the meaning of truth as defined by Nicholas Wolterstorff in his article “True Words.” How does Wolterstorff define truth? interact with his… Read More »“True Words” by Nicholas Wolterstorff – what is truth?
Continuation of the discussion on Avery Dulles’ book, “Models of Revelation.” This post discusses the dialectical presence model and the new awareness model. Finally, it… Read More »Models of Revelation continued: Presence, Awareness, and Proper Evangelical
Book Review of Stanley Grenz and Roger Olson’s “Who Needs Theology”. The book describes the public misconception about theology in the church, the good and the bad, and… Read More »RESPONSE TO GRENZ & OLSON, WHO NEEDS THEOLOGY?
DEFINING POSTMODERNISM: The subject of this assignment was to create a personal, working definition for Postmodernism. This is part 1. The second part will describe… Read More »Postmodernism: a definition for the undefined