Conclusion to Representative Imputation of Sin
Today we close this topic on the imputation of sin and summarize the past few posts. In the previous post, it was determined that the… Read More »Conclusion to Representative Imputation of Sin
Today we close this topic on the imputation of sin and summarize the past few posts. In the previous post, it was determined that the… Read More »Conclusion to Representative Imputation of Sin
This post will finish the case for the representative immediate imputation of sin that was started in the previous post. This post will further review… Read More »The case for representative immediate imputation of sin pt 2
Over the past few posts, we have looked at the three major views/models on the imputation of sin. We have looked at what this idea… Read More »The Case for the Representative View
Today’s post gives a brief introduction into the three major views on imputed sin. There are a couple of views that will not be looked at… Read More »Intro: The Three Major Views on Imputed Sin
Today’s post will finish the brief examination on what is sin, what is imputed sin, and how does it fit into a representative model. What… Read More »Examination of Imputed Sin pt. 2
We now turn our attention to further examining imputed sin. Where does it come from? What is it? Does it differ based on different denominations? Are there different views on this? If so, what do they believe? This post and the following post will start to examine these questions and hopefully provide more information on this doctrine and offer a glimpse at the beauty of what Christ did.
In the judicial and theological sense, to impute is to attribute anything to a person or persons, upon adequate grounds, as the judicial or meritorious reason of reward or punishment.[1] “To impute sin, in Scriptural and theological language, is to impute the guilt of sin.”[2] Guilt does not mean a corruption or fault, but the legal obligation to satisfy justice. The consequence of imputation is more than merely an infliction but a punishment; an evil imposed in execution of the penalty of law and for the satisfaction of justice.[3] So far as the meaning of the word is concerned, it makes no difference whether the thing imputed is sin or righteousness; whether it is our own personally, or the sin or righteousness of another.[4] The Reformed and Lutheran theologians admit that in the imputation of Adam’s sin to humans, of human’s sins to Christ, and of Christ’s righteousness to believers, the nature of imputation is the same, each illustrating the others.[5]Read More »Examination of Imputed Sin pt.1
This post will continue the series on the imputation of sin by providing a brief background on this topic and will foreshadow the evidence for… Read More »Background on Imputed Sin